Sorting: Sort array based on multiple conditions in Ruby
You should always use sort_by
for a keyed sort. Not only is it much more readable, it is also much more efficient. In addition, I would also prefer to use destructuring bind, again, for readability:
array.sort_by {|name, age| [age, name] }
How to sort a ruby array by two conditions
This should do it:
require 'ostruct'
arr = [
OpenStruct.new(percent: 73, type: 1),
OpenStruct.new(percent: 70, type: 4),
OpenStruct.new(percent: 60, type: 4),
OpenStruct.new(percent: 50, type: 4),
OpenStruct.new(percent: 64, type: 1),
OpenStruct.new(percent: 74, type: 2)
]
puts arr.sort_by { |a| [a.type % 4, -a.percent] }
output:
#<OpenStruct percent=70, type=4>
#<OpenStruct percent=60, type=4>
#<OpenStruct percent=50, type=4>
#<OpenStruct percent=73, type=1>
#<OpenStruct percent=64, type=1>
#<OpenStruct percent=74, type=2>
How to sort array of strings with multiple conditions?
If these attributes are database columns, you can use:
Organization.order(attribute_a: :desc, attribute_b: :asc)
Otherwise, use sort
with an array:
Arrays are compared in an “element-wise” manner; the first two elements that are not equal will determine the return value for the whole comparison.
Exchanging the first elements sorts them in descending order:
array.sort { |x, y| [y.attribute_a, x.attribute_b] <=> [x.attribute_a, y.attribute_b] }
# ^ ^
# | |
# +-------- x and y exchanged -------+
To generate a list as mentioned in your comment, you can use group_by
:
<% sorted_array.group_by(&:attribute_a).each do |attr, group| %>
<%= attr %> #=> "Type z"
<% group.each do |item| %>
<%= item.attribute_b %> #=> "name a", "name b", ...
<% end %>
<% end %>
sorting and rearranging an array of hashes based on multiple conditions
Here is another option using what you already have as a base (Since you were basically all the way there)
a = [
{ "name" => "X", "year" => "2013-08"},
{ "name" => "A", "year" => "2017-01"},
{ "name" => "X", "year" => "2000-08"},
{ "name" => "B", "year" => "2018-05"},
{ "name" => "D", "year" => "2016-04"},
{ "name" => "C", "year" => "2016-04"}
]
a.sort do |a,b|
a_ord, b_ord = [a,b].map {|e| e["name"] == "X" ? 0 : 1 }
[a_ord,b["year"],a["name"] ] <=> [b_ord, a["year"],b["name"]]
end
Here we just make sure that "X" is always in front by assigning it a 0 and everything else a 1. Then since 0 and 0 would be equivalent X will fall back to the same logic you already have applied as will all the others. We can make this a bit fancier as:
a.sort do |a,b|
[a,b].map {|e| e["name"] == "X" ? 0 : 1 }.zip(
[b["year"],a["year"]],[a["name"],b["name"]]
).reduce(:<=>)
end
Sort an array and make it unique on multiple conditions - Ruby
you can use sort_by
method and uniq
and values_at
hashForAnimals.sort_by{ |a| a[:sortOrder] }.uniq{ |k| k.values_at(:animalCd, :animalType) }
# => [{:animalCd=>"Cow", :animalType=>"Carnivore", :sortOrder=>1}, {:animalCd=>"Rabbit", :animalType=>"Herbivore", :sortOrder=>2}, {:animalCd=>"Tiger", :animalType=>"Carnivore", :sortOrder=>3}, {:animalCd=>"Shark", :animalType=>"Carnivore", :sortOrder=>4}, {:animalCd=>"Cow", :animalType=>"Herbivore", :sortOrder=>5}, {:animalCd=>"Bear", :animalType=>"Omnivore", :sortOrder=>7}]
How can I sort by multiple conditions with different orders?
How about:
ordered_list = [[1, "b"], [1, "a"], [2, "a"]]
ordered_list.sort! do |a,b|
[a[0],b[1]] <=> [b[0], a[1]]
end
Sorting By Multiple Conditions in Ruby
You should always sort by the same criteria to insure a meaningful order. If comparing two nil
dates, it is fine that the position
will judge of the order, but if comparing one nil
date with a set date, you have to decide which goes first, irrespective of the position (for example by mapping nil
to a day way in the past).
Otherwise imagine the following:
a.date = nil ; a.position = 1
b.date = Time.now - 1.day ; b.position = 2
c.date = Time.now ; c.position = 0
By your original criteria, you would have: a < b < c < a. So, which one is the smallest??
You also want to do the sort at once. For your <=>
implementation, use #nonzero?
:
def <=>(other)
return nil unless other.is_a?(Post)
(self.category <=> other.category).nonzero? ||
((self.date || AGES_AGO) <=> (other.date || AGES_AGO)).nonzero? ||
(self.position <=> other.position).nonzero? ||
0
end
If you use your comparison criteria just once, or if that criteria is not universal and thus don't want to define <=>
, you could use sort
with a block:
post_ary.sort{|a, b| (a.category <=> ...).non_zero? || ... }
Better still, there is sort_by
and sort_by!
which you can use to build an array for what to compare in which priority:
post_ary.sort_by{|a| [a.category, a.date || AGES_AGO, a.position] }
Besides being shorter, using sort_by
has the advantage that you can only obtain a well ordered criteria.
Notes:
sort_by!
was introduced in Ruby 1.9.2. You canrequire 'backports/1.9.2/array/sort_by'
to use it with older Rubies.- I'm assuming that
Post
is not a subclass ofActiveRecord::Base
(in which case you'd want the sort to be done by the db server).
Rails Sort Array By Two Columns
Use sort_by:
surveys.sort_by { |survey| [survey.length, survey.cost] }
If you want to control asc vs desc, just multiply by -1:
surveys.sort_by { |survey| [-1 * survey.length, survey.cost] }
This should work for both regular array of objects or ActiveRecord::Relation
Ruby Sort an array of arrays of numbers based on multiple conditions
My understanding is that when a[2] >= 0
, sorting is to on the array [a[1], a[2]]
, and elements for which a[2] < 0
are to be at the end of the sorted array and sorted by [-a[1], -a[2]]
.
biggest_plus_1 = to_sort.map { |a| a[2] }.max + 1
#=> 3
to_sort.sort_by { |a| a[2] >= 0 ? [0, a[1], a[2]] : [biggest_plus_1, -a[1], -a[2]] }
#=> [[6, 27, 1, 11.0], [7, 27, 1, 12.0], [8, 27, 1, 13.0], [9, 27, 2, 14.0],
# [5, 27, -2, 5.0], [2, 27, -2, 2.0], [3, 27, -2, 3.0], [4, 27, -2, 4.0],
# [1, 27, -3, 1.0]]
Array#sort and Enumerable#sort_by rely on the method Array#<=> for determining the ordering of each pair of arrays being sorted. Two arrays, a
and b
are ordered lexicographically, meaning the following. If a[0] < b[0]
then a
is less than b
(a < b
), or equivalently, a <=> b #=> -1
. Similarly, if a[0] > b[0]
then a
is greater than b
(a > b
) and a <=> b #=> 1
. If a[0] == b[0]
, the tie is broken by the comparing the second elements in the same way, and so on. If a
is smaller than b
(a.size < b.size
), and the first a.size
elements of each array are equal, a < b
. a
and b
are equal if and only if a <=> b #=> 0
.
Since elements a
for which a[2] < 0
are to be placed at the end of the sorted array, we need to sort by arrays whose first elements place the array at the front or back of the sorted array. It is for that reason that I made the first element of the sort-by array zero when a[2] >= 0
and biggest_plus_1
when a[2] < 0
, where biggest_plus_1
is the largest value of a[2]
plus 1.
The remaining elements of the sort-by arrays determine how each of the two groups of arrays are to be sorted.
Note that biggest_plus_1
will be non-positive if all a[2] < 0
, but that doesn't matter, as no element will be sorted by an array whose first element is zero.
Related Topics
Vps Apache Config - Invalid Command 'Passengerdefaultruby' After Adding Latest Passenger Gem
Save Google Cloud Speech API Operation(Job) Object to Retrieve Results Later
Perfect Way to Write a Gsub for a Regex Match
Instantiate Capybara Browser and Set a Proxy
Sum of All Amount If Charge Dates Are the Same in Stripe
How to Strip Commas from Float Input
How to Convert a Large Gem to Standalone Rails App
Make a Ruby Script with Text Io Double Clickable Executable File
Rspec - How to Test Activerecord::Recordnotfound
Selenium Can't Find Fields with Type Number
Ruby Webrick Http Authentication
If Referer = "/Search", Do X, Else Do Y: "Bad Argument (Expected Uri Object or Uri String)"
Sending Form Data to Remote Rails Application Using Httparty
Does Will Pagination Work with Forms Which Have Method="Post"
How to Link to a Nested Route Path Inside a Loop
Regex to Extract Boundary and Content Type Out of Mail Headers