Regression with Heteroskedasticity Corrected Standard Errors

Regression with Heteroskedasticity Corrected Standard Errors

I think you are on the right track with coeftest in package lmtest. Take a look at the sandwich package which includes this functionality and is designed to work hand in hand with the lmtest package you have already found.

> # generate linear regression relationship
> # with Homoskedastic variances
> x <- sin(1:100)
> y <- 1 + x + rnorm(100)
> ## model fit and HC3 covariance
> fm <- lm(y ~ x)
> vcovHC(fm)
(Intercept) x
(Intercept) 0.010809366 0.001209603
x 0.001209603 0.018353076
> coeftest(fm, vcov. = vcovHC)

t test of coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 1.01973 0.10397 9.8081 3.159e-16 ***
x 0.93992 0.13547 6.9381 4.313e-10 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

To get the F test, look at function waldtest():

> waldtest(fm, vcov = vcovHC)
Wald test

Model 1: y ~ x
Model 2: y ~ 1
Res.Df Df F Pr(>F)
1 98
2 99 -1 48.137 4.313e-10 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

You could always cook up a simple function to combine these two for you if you wanted the one-liner...

There are lots of examples in the Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators vignette that comes with the sandwich package of linking lmtest and sandwich to do what you want.

Edit: A one-liner could be as simple as:

mySummary <- function(model, VCOV) {
print(coeftest(model, vcov. = VCOV))
print(waldtest(model, vcov = VCOV))
}

Which we can use like this (on the examples from above):

> mySummary(fm, vcovHC)

t test of coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 1.01973 0.10397 9.8081 3.159e-16 ***
x 0.93992 0.13547 6.9381 4.313e-10 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Wald test

Model 1: y ~ x
Model 2: y ~ 1
Res.Df Df F Pr(>F)
1 98
2 99 -1 48.137 4.313e-10 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Getting statsmodels to use heteroskedasticity corrected standard errors in coefficient t-tests

The fit method of the linear models, discrete models and GLM, take a cov_type and a cov_kwds argument for specifying robust covariance matrices. This will be attached to the results instance and used for all inference and statistics reported in the summary table.

Unfortunately, the documentation doesn't really show this yet in an appropriate way.
The auxiliary method that actually selects the sandwiches based on the options shows the options and required arguments:
http://statsmodels.sourceforge.net/devel/generated/statsmodels.regression.linear_model.OLS.fit.html

For example, estimating an OLS model and using HC3 covariance matrices can be done with

model_ols = OLS(...)
result = model_ols.fit(cov_type='HC3')
result.bse
result.t_test(....)

Some sandwiches require additional arguments, for example cluster robust standard errors, can be selected in the following way, assuming mygroups is an array that contains the groups labels:

results = OLS(...).fit(cov_type='cluster', cov_kwds={'groups': mygroups}
results.bse
...

Some robust covariance matrices make additional assumptions about the data without checking. For example heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation robust standard errors or Newey-West, HAC, standard errors assume a sequential time series structure. Some panel data robust standard errors also assume stacking of the time series by individuals.

A separate option use_t is available to specify whether the t and F or the normal and chisquare distributions should be used by default for Wald tests and confidence intervals.

How to cluster standard errors with small sample corrections in R

Using -...vcovHC(df, type="sss", cluster="study")- is a dated way to incorporate small sample corrections. Upon understanding differences between the sandwich estimators HC0-HC4, using the code previous to it:

coeftest(reg, vcov = vcovHC(reg, type="HC1")

is appropriate with the corresponding sandwich estimator in the type argument. The issue was with the dated syntax that followed and this is the correct format.



Related Topics



Leave a reply



Submit