Noop for Swift's Exhaustive Switch Statements
According to the book, you need to use break
there:
The scope of each case can’t be empty. As a result, you must include at least one statement following the colon (:) of each case label. Use a single
break
statement if you don’t intend to execute any code in the body of a matched case.
How do I create a noop block for a switch case in Swift?
default:
break
Apple talks about this keyword in this article. See here, too.
Although break is not required in Swift, you can still use a break statement to match and ignore a particular case, or to break out of a matched case before that case has completed its execution.
Exhaustive condition of switch case in Swift
Swift only truly verifies that a switch
block is exhaustive when working with enum
types. Even a switching on Bool
requires a default
block in addition to true
and false
:
var b = true
switch b {
case true: println("true")
case false: println("false")
}
// error: switch must be exhaustive, consider adding a default clause
With an enum
, however, the compiler is happy to only look at the two cases:
enum MyBool {
case True
case False
}
var b = MyBool.True
switch b {
case .True: println("true")
case .False: println("false")
}
If you need to include a default
block for the compiler's sake but don't have anything for it to do, the break
keyword comes in handy:
var b = true
switch b {
case true: println("true")
case false: println("false")
default: break
}
Switch statement must be exhaustive
Xcode checks if the switch statement is exhaustive only if you're switching enums. For every other case, it checks if there is a default statement, and if not, it puts up a warning.
You can either use enums, or squelch the warning if you want to, or, just add the missing default statement doing nothing.
Switch must be exhaustive in Xcode 12
In WWDC 2020, iOS 14 Apple introduced a new feature that will give limited access to the photo library. You are missing .limited
case for outer main Switch. Your updated code:
switch PHPhotoLibrary.authorizationStatus(for: .readWrite) {
case .notDetermined:
// ask for access
case .restricted, .denied:
// sorry
case .authorized:
// we have full access
// new option:
case .limited:
// we only got access to a part of the library
}
For More, you can check here
Non-exhaustive pattern match for Swift enum
if [.One, .Two, .Three, .Four].contains(num) {
Swift switch statement force to write block of code
Just get your function to return in that case:
case .hamburger:
return
Hope that helps.
Per the discussion and @MartinR 's comment, break is probably a better general solution to exit the switch statement.
Related Topics
Multiple Sheet(Ispresented:) Doesn't Work in Swiftui
Decrement Index in a Loop After Swift C-Style Loops Deprecated
What Is the Meaning of the '#' Mark in Swift Language
Convert String to Url (Why Is Resulting Variable Nil)
Swift Beta Performance: Sorting Arrays
How to Declare an Array of Weak References in Swift
Dynamically Hiding View in Swiftui
How to Use Attributed String in Swiftui
How to Compare One Value Against Multiple Values - Swift
How to Convert a View (Not Uiview) to an Image
In Swiftui, How to Increase the Height of a Button
How to Convert Unix Epoch Time to Date and Time in iOS Swift
What Happened to the Uiview() Constructor in Swift 3.0