Conforming to Hashable Protocol

Conforming to Hashable protocol?

You're missing the declaration:

struct DateStruct: Hashable {

And your == function is wrong. You should compare the three properties.

static func == (lhs: DateStruct, rhs: DateStruct) -> Bool {
return lhs.year == rhs.year && lhs.month == rhs.month && lhs.day == rhs.day
}

It's possible for two different values to have the same hash value.

Make a swift protocol conform to Hashable

Deriving the protocol from Hashable and using a type eraser might help here:

protocol SomeLocation: Hashable {
var name: String { get }
var coordinates: Coordinate { get }
}

struct AnyLocation: SomeLocation {
let name: String
let coordinates: Coordinate

init<L: SomeLocation>(_ location: L) {
name = location.name
coordinates = location.coordinates
}
}

You then can simply declare the protocol conformance on the structs, and if Coordinate is already Hashable, then you don't need to write any extra hashing code code, since the compiler can automatically synthesize for you (and so will do for new types as long as all their properties are Hashable:

struct ShopLocation: SomeLocation, Decodable {
var name: String
var coordinates: Coordinate
}

struct CarLocation: SomeLocation, Decodable {
var name: String
var coordinates: Coordinate
}

If Coordinate is also Codable, then you also can omit writing any code for the encoding/decoding operations, the compile will synthesize the required methods (provided all other properties are already Codable).

You can then use the eraser within the annotation class by forwardingn the initializer constraints:

final class LocationAnnotation: NSObject, MKAnnotation {   
let location: AnyLocation

init<L: SomeLocation>(location: L) {
self.location = AnyLocation(location)
super.init()
}

override var hash: Int {
location.hashValue
}

override func isEqual(_ object: Any?) -> Bool {
(object as? LocationAnnotation)?.location == location
}
}

Swift - Can I make a protocol Hashable?

As @Leo Dabus mentioned in his comment, you should probably use another name for your protocol due to native Foundation.Data type existence.

Either way, using the following code you can implement Hashable protocol into your Data protocol:

public protocol Data: Hashable {
var state: [String: Any] { get set }
var objectId: String? { get set }
}

public extension Data {
var objectId: String? {
get {
return self.state["objectId"] as? String
}
set {
self.state["objectId"] = newValue
}
}

static func == (lhs: Self, rhs: Self) -> Bool {
return lhs.objectId == rhs.objectId
}

func hash(into hasher: inout Hasher) {
hasher.combine(self.objectId ?? "")
}
}

Although this will have as a side effect that protocol Data can only be used as a generic constraint because it has Self or associated type requirements:

Sample Image

Meaning that you can now on use the Data protocol like this:

func myFunc<T: Data>(data: T) {

}

Swift - Type '' does not conform to protocol 'Hashable'

Supply your own implementation for Hashable by overriding hash(into:) and call combine on all the relevant properties.

struct ListAction: Hashable {
static func == (lhs: ListAction, rhs: ListAction) -> Bool {
return lhs.label == rhs.label && lhs.command == rhs.command
}

func hash(into hasher: inout Hasher) {
hasher.combine(label)
hasher.combine(command)
}

let label: String
let action: (() -> Void)? = nil
let command: Command? = nil
}


Related Topics



Leave a reply



Submit