Getting a map() to return a list in Python 3.x
Do this:
list(map(chr,[66,53,0,94]))
In Python 3+, many processes that iterate over iterables return iterators themselves. In most cases, this ends up saving memory, and should make things go faster.
If all you're going to do is iterate over this list eventually, there's no need to even convert it to a list, because you can still iterate over the map
object like so:
# Prints "ABCD"
for ch in map(chr,[65,66,67,68]):
print(ch)
Why does map return a map object instead of a list in Python 3?
I think the reason why map still exists at all when generator expressions also exist, is that it can take multiple iterator arguments that are all looped over and passed into the function:
>>> list(map(min, [1,2,3,4], [0,10,0,10]))
[0,2,0,4]
That's slightly easier than using zip:
>>> list(min(x, y) for x, y in zip([1,2,3,4], [0,10,0,10]))
Otherwise, it simply doesn't add anything over generator expressions.
Python 3 map is returning a list of NoneType objects instead of the type I modified?
This is because, your incr_number doesn't return anything. Change it to:
def incr_number(self, incr=0):
self.number += incr
return self
list object created by map,filter returns empty list
The returned object from filter works like an iterator; you can only iterate over it once:
>>> x=[1,2,3,4,5,6]
>>> odds=filter(lambda n: n%2 == 1, x)
>>> list(odds)
[1, 3, 5]
>>> list(odds)
[]
It's "used up" after the first time you loop over it (which happens in the map() line).
Same is true of the map
object.
Using map() with two arguments where one argument is a list and the other an integer
You can use currying, like with partial
from functools
:
from functools import partial
def change_salaries(employees: list, amt: int) -> list:
return list(map(partial(change_salary, amt=amt), employees))
double convert map to list return null
The whole reason to convert a map
to a list
is that a map is a single-use iterator; once you iterate over it once, it's exhausted ("empty") because it doesn't actually store its contents anywhere.
A list
stores all of its values and can be iterated over multiple times (it creates new iterators on demand).
The solution is to turn the map into a list once and save a reference to the list:
a=map(float, [1,2,3])
b = list(a)
# now you can iterate over b as much as you want
Note also that in place of map
you can simply do a list comprehension to create a list in a single step:
a = [float(i) for i in [1, 2, 3]]
# now you can iterate over a as much as you want
Trying to map through return list of dictionary with python
Do you want to sum all digits?
in that case you can use sum
function:
...
print(sum(map(switch, numbers)))
You don't need to convert map
result to list
since sum
accepts iterables.
Related Topics
Flask View Return Error "View Function Did Not Return a Response"
How to Add a New Column to an Existing Dataframe
Equivalent of Shell 'Cd' Command to Change the Working Directory
Explanation of How Nested List Comprehension Works
How to Disable Python Warnings
How to Understand Closure in a Lambda
What Is the _Del_ Method and How to Call It
How to Retrieve a Module'S Path
How to Get the Path and Name of the File That Is Currently Executing
Convert List of Dictionaries to a Pandas Dataframe
Flask View Raises Typeerror: 'Bool' Object Is Not Callable
Select Dataframe Rows Between Two Dates
How to Get Time of a Python Program'S Execution
Why Does Substring Slicing With Index Out of Range Work
Append Existing Excel Sheet With New Dataframe Using Python Pandas