What does The type T must be a reference type in order to use it as parameter mean?
If you look at the definition of DbSet<TEntity>
:
public class DbSet<TEntity> : DbQuery<TEntity>, IDbSet<TEntity>, IQueryable<TEntity>, IEnumerable<TEntity>, IQueryable, IEnumerable, IInternalSetAdapter
where TEntity : class
Because it has a type constraint
that the generic type must be a class
then you must initialize it with a type that also matches this condition:
public class GenericRecordController<T> : Controller where T : class
{ ... }
The type must be a reference type in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method
I can't repro, but I suspect that in your actual code there is a constraint somewhere that T : class
- you need to propagate that to make the compiler happy, for example (hard to say for sure without a repro example):
public class Derived<SomeModel> : Base<SomeModel> where SomeModel : class, IModel
^^^^^
see this bit
The type T must be a reference type in order to use it as parameter while using interface
class
and struct
in generic type constaints do not mean the same thing as the class
and struct
declarations that are used to declare class or struct types. Instead, they only restrict whether a generic type argument is a reference type (class
), or a value type (struct
).
So when you do where T : class
you are not saying that T
needs to be a class, you are saying that T
needs to be a reference type. Similarly struct
for value types.
Interfaces on their own do not have this property, so an interface can be implemented by both a reference type and a value type. As such, restricting your type to be of an interface does not really make sense there.
In your case, Moq requires you to pass a reference type, so you need to transitively carry over that type constraint in all your helper methods:
public static Moq.Mock<T> CreateInstanceOfIMock<T>()
where T : class
{
return new Moq.Mock<T>();
}
That’s all you need to do to create a mock of any valid type. You can use it with an interface using CreateInstanceOfIMock<IColorsRepository>()
or any other type.
Of course, at that point, the method does not really make that much sense since it does not give you any benefit over just instantiating the mock yourself.
The type 'T' must be a reference type in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method 'QueryAPI.QueryT()
I would remove T
from Foo()
here since your parent class Test<T>
is already generic.
You should also add a new()
constraint otherwise there will be another error since QueryAPI expects a type with default constructor.
Also, some renames to include Async
are in order.
public class Test<T> where T : class, UnicontaBaseEntity, new()
{
private async Task FooAsync(QueryAPI queryAPI, CrudAPI crudAPI, SyncSettings syncSettings)
{
Task<T[]> result = await queryAPI.QueryAsync<T>();
}
}
public interface UnicontaBaseEntity : UnicontaStreamableEntity
{
int CompanyId { get; }
Type BaseEntityType();
}
public class QueryAPI : BaseAPI
{
...
public Task<T[]> QueryAsync<T>() where T : class, UnicontaBaseEntity, new()
...
}
The type must be a reference type in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method
I can't repro, but I suspect that in your actual code there is a constraint somewhere that T : class
- you need to propagate that to make the compiler happy, for example (hard to say for sure without a repro example):
public class Derived<SomeModel> : Base<SomeModel> where SomeModel : class, IModel
^^^^^
see this bit
The type 'T' must be a reference type in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method 'TableClient.QueryAsyncT
Let's look at the doc for that method:
public virtual Azure.AsyncPageable<T> QueryAsync<T> (string filter = default, int? maxPerPage = default, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<string> select = default, System.Threading.CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) where T : class, Azure.Data.Tables.ITableEntity, new();
See that generic type constraint:
where T : class, Azure.Data.Tables.ITableEntity, new();
That means that any T
you pass in must be a class, must implement ITableEntity
, and must have a parameterless constructor.
However, your method doesn't enforce this. You only require that T
implements ITableStorageEntity
. Your method could theoretically accept something which implements ITableStorageEntity
but isn't a class, or doesn't have a parameterless constructor, and pass it to Azure's QueryAsync<T>
, and then what? You've broken the rules!
Your method needs to have the same generic type constraints as QueryAsync<T>
, or tighter:
public async Task<IList<T>> QueryAsync<T>(string queryText, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
where T : class, ITableStorageEntity, new()
The type must be a reference type to be used as a parameter
The DbSet<TEntity> type requires its type argument to be a reference type. You can ensure this is the case by adding a generic type constraint:
private IQueryable<TEntity> Search<TEntity>(...) where TEntity : class
{
...
}
Related Topics
Inno Setup for Windows Service
How to Easily Initialize a List of Tuples
Linq Select Objects in List Where Exists in (A,B,C)
404 Error After Adding Web API to an Existing MVC Web Application
C# Naming Convention for Constants
Mocking Iprincipal in ASP.NET Core
What's the New C# Await Feature Do
Export Datatable to Excel File
Best Practice to Make a Multi Language Application in C#/Winforms
Why Can't C# Interfaces Contain Fields
How to Get Current Page Url in MVC 3
How to Flatten Nested Objects with Linq Expression
How to Update Values into Appsetting.JSON
Appsettings Get Value from .Config File
Suppressing "Is Never Used" and "Is Never Assigned To" Warnings in C#