Serialization of Entity Framework Objects with One to Many Relationship

How to serialize entities that have a one-to-many relationship with Entity Framework?

So to solve my problem I disabled lazy loading by disabling EF proxies:

ApplicationDbContext.cs

public ApplicationDbContext() : base("name=ApplicationDbContext")
{
Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;
}

And I eagerly loaded the Rooms in my GET method in the Houses controller:

HousesController.cs

public IQueryable<House> GetHouses()
{
return db.Houses.Include(r => r.Rooms);
}

Which returned the XML that I wanted:

<ArrayOfHouse xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/Test.Models">
<House>
<Address>Boaty McBoatface Street 123</Address>
<ID>1</ID>
<Rooms>
<Room>
<ID>1</ID>
<Name>Room</Name>
</Room>
<Room>
<ID>2</ID>
<Name>Kitchen</Name>
</Room>
</Rooms>
</House>
</ArrayOfHouse>

Update:

I have found another solution that achieves my initial goal. Instead of disabling EF proxies you can remove the virtual keyword from your properties and then you only have to explicitly include the Entities that you want in the GET method, like this:

House.cs

public class House
{
public int ID { get; set; }

public string Address { get; set; }

public ICollection<Room> Rooms { get; set; }

public House()
{
Rooms = new List<Room>();
}
}

Room.cs

public class Room
{
public int ID { get; set; }

public string Name { get; set; }
}

Following this approach, I have removed the navigation property from Room because that was aggravating the serialization issue since it was causing a circular dependency between the two entities.

HouseController.cs

public IQueryable<House> GetHouses()
{
return db.Houses.Include(r => r.Rooms);
}

Serialization of Entity Framework objects with One to Many Relationship

When you see an object like:

System.Data.Entity.DynamicProxies.Tag_FF17EDDE6893000F7672649A39962DB0CA591C699DDB73E8C2A56203ED7C7B6D

It is a runtime EF Generated version of a proxy to what would normally be considered a POCO object.

Entity Framework has created this object because it tracks when the objects has changed so when you call .SaveChanges() it can optimize what to do. The downfall of this is that you aren't actually using the specific object you defined, thus Data Contracts and Frameworks (Json.net) cannot use them as they would your original POCO object.

To Prevent EF from returning this object you have two choices (ATM):

First, Try turning off Proxy object creation on your DbContext.

DbContext.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;

This will completely disable the create of Proxy objects for every query to the specific DbContext. (This does not affect the cached object in the ObjectContext).

Secondly, use EntityFramework 5.0+ with AsNoTracking()
(ProxyCreationEnabled is still available in EF 5.0 as well)

You should also be able to

DbContext.Persons.AsNoTracking().FirstOrDefault();

or

DbContext.Persons.
.Include(i => i.Parents)
.AsNoTracking()
.FirstOrDefault();

Instead of globally disabling proxy creation for the DbContext, this only turns it off per query. (This DOES affect the cached object in the ObjectContext, it is not cached)

Entity Framework - How To Configure One-To-Many Relationship Navigation Properties Correctly

Your error is not the result of a mistake in your entity design, but rather that of your json serializer. The json serializer sees a Vendor reference in the VendorImage class, and can't cope with the object nesting.

To resolve this, you can either do this quick hack (this should work for both System.text.Json and NewtonSoft, but make sure to use the correct using statement):

public class VendorImage
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int VendorImageId { get; set; }
[Required, MaxLength(50)]
public string ImageUrl { get; set; }

public int VendorId { get; set; }
[JsonIgnore] //Add an attribute to ignore this property during serialization.
public Vendor Vendor { get; set; }
}

public class Vendor
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int VendorId { get; set; }
[Required, MaxLength(50)]
public string Name { get; set; }

public ICollection<VendorImage> VendorImages { get; set; }
}

or tell your service to ignore loop handling:

services.AddControllers().AddNewtonsoftJson(options =>
options.SerializerSettings.ReferenceLoopHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.ReferenceLoopHandling.Ignore
);

EntityFramework and custom classes with object arrays (one-to-many)

"only a table named products is being created in the database with the right data"

Check in your context class whether you have DBSet properties for distributors and country_markets as well.

Your context class should have at least these properties:

// Represents the Products table in the database.
public DbSet<Product> products { get; set;}

// Represents the Distributor table in the database.
public DbSet<Distributor> distributors { get; set;}

// Represents the CountryMarkets table in the database.
public DbSet<Country_Market> country_markets { get; set;}

The way your entity classes are currently made, Entity Framework has no way of determining the relationship between them.

Here's some information based on an example:
If you want to have a one-to-one relationship between two classes, say Product and Distributor. One of the two classes will need to have a property referencing the other.
Lets say a product has a particular distributor, your code would look like this:

public class Product
{
[Key]
public int product_id { get; set; }

public Distributor distributor { get; set; }
}

public class Distributor
{

[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }

public string name { get; set; }
}

That's how you define a one-to-one relationship between two entity classes.
Now, let's say a product can have many distributors. As you guessed it, a one-to-many relationship. Your code would then look like this:

public class Product
{
[Key]
public int product_id { get; set; }

public ICollection<Distributor> distributors { get; set; }
}

public class Distributor
{

[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }

public string name { get; set; }
}

Note: If you are going to add a new Product with an existing Distributor in the database, you will need to get this Distributor from the database first and add it to the Distributor property of the Product. Otherwise Entity Framework will complain that you are trying to add duplicate keys.

It is not necessary to create a class with a plural name of the entity that you want to persist. Maybe you need them for XML serialization/deserialization but for Entity Framework this is not needed. I personally would first deserialize the XML data into DTO (Data Transfer Object) classes and convert these to entity classes next.

Without too much context of your application, your entity classes would need to look something like this (without XML attributes for simplicity):

namespace project.Models    
{
public class Product
{
[Key]
public int product_id { get; set; }

public ICollection<Distributor> Distributors { get; set; }

public ICollection<Country_Market> Country_Markets { get; set; }
}

public class Distributor
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }

public string name { get; set; }
}

public class Country_Market
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }

public string shortcode { get; set; }
}
}

I would also advice to add a primary key to the Country_Market entity class.
Just like in the example above.

Lastly, I would delete the database and run your code again to verify whether tables are created correctly.

Hope this helps and gives you a better understanding how Entity Framework sets relationships between entities.

Entity Framework Core returning object with many to many relationship

If you use Include or Theninclude in your query it will create circular references. JSON cannot handle circular reference. You can easily overcome this problem using Select query.

Without DTO:

Write your GetAll() controller-method as follows:

[HttpGet]
public IActionResult GetAll()
{
var objectList = _context.Objects.Select(o => new
{
o.ObjectId,
Tags = o.ObjectTags.Select(ot => ot.Tag).ToList()
}).ToList();

return Ok(objectList);
}

With DTO:

Write your DTO class as follows:

public class ObjectDto
{
public int ObjectId { get; set; }
....
public List<Tag> Tags { get; set; }
}

Then your GetAll() controller-method should be as follows:

[HttpGet]
public ActionResult<List<ObjectDto>> GetAll()
{
var objectList = _context.Objects.Select(o => new ObjectDto
{
ObjectId = o.ObjectId,
Tags = o.ObjectTags.Select(ot => ot.Tag).ToList()
}).ToList();

return objectList;
}

Note: If you use Select inside your query you don't need to use Include or Theninclude.

Hope it will now work as expected!

Unique names within a one to many relationship

For combining BlogId and Name restrict, you could define a Index for Article like below:

        builder.Entity<Blog>().HasIndex(b => b.Name).IsUnique();
builder.Entity<Blog>().HasMany(b => b.Articles).WithOne().OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
builder.Entity<Article>().HasIndex(a => new { a.Name, a.BlogId }).IsUnique();


Related Topics



Leave a reply



Submit