Does foreach automatically call Dispose?
Yes, foreach will call Dispose() on the enumerator if it implements IDisposable.
Enumerator disposal when not using using, foreach or manually calling Dispose()
When enumerating over this iterator, if the enumerator's
Dispose()
is not explicitly called, and not used within ausing
statement, would the underlying iterator remain in an open state?
Let me re-phrase that question into a form that is easier to answer.
When using
foreach
to enumerate via an iterator block that contains ausing
statement, are the resources disposed of when control leaves the loop?
Yes.
What mechanisms ensure this?
These three:
A
using
statement is just a convenient way to write atry-finally
where thefinally
disposes of the resource.The
foreach
loop is also a convenient syntax fortry-finally
, and again, thefinally
callsDispose
on the enumerator when control leaves the loop.The enumerator produced by an iterator block implements
IDisposable
. CallingDispose()
on it ensures that all thefinally
blocks in the iterator block are executed, includingfinally
blocks that come fromusing
statements.
If I avoid the
foreach
loop, callGetEnumerator
myself, and don't callDispose
on the enumerator, do I have a guarantee that thefinally
blocks of the enumerator will run?
Nope. Always dispose your enumerators. They implement IDisposable
for a reason.
Is that now clear?
If this subject interests you then you should read my long series on design characteristics of iterator blocks in C#.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/tags/iterators/
why these objects are not getting disposed
foreach
doesn't call the Dispose
method, only using
does. using
directive is just a sugar for:
try {
// Initialize
}
finally {
// Dispose
}
And yes, you have to write Dispose
call by youself, like this:
foreach (var e in GetEmployees())
{
Console.WriteLine(e.Name);
e.Dispose();
}
or
foreach (var e in GetEmployees())
{
using (e)
{
Console.WriteLine(e.Name);
}
}
Consider Dispose Pattern from MSDN for better understanding way the Disposing
works in .NET:
Simple use-case:
public class DisposableResourceHolder : IDisposable {
private SafeHandle resource; // handle to a resource
public DisposableResourceHolder(){
this.resource = ... // allocates the resource
}
public void Dispose(){
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing){
if (disposing){
if (resource!= null) resource.Dispose();
}
}
}
Complex use-case with finalizible types:
public class ComplexResourceHolder : IDisposable {
private IntPtr buffer; // unmanaged memory buffer
private SafeHandle resource; // disposable handle to a resource
public ComplexResourceHolder(){
this.buffer = ... // allocates memory
this.resource = ... // allocates the resource
}
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing){
ReleaseBuffer(buffer); // release unmanaged memory
if (disposing){ // release other disposable objects
if (resource!= null) resource.Dispose();
}
}
~ ComplexResourceHolder(){
Dispose(false);
}
public void Dispose(){
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
}
Update: As in comments noted, I think that you are mixing up the Garbage Collection
and Disposing
. Disposing
is used for freeing up the unmanaged resources outside the .NET Framework in your application. Garbage Collection
is done automatically and you should not force it until you have completely understanding why do you need it.
Proper way to Dispose of IDisposable COM Object Wrappers After foreach Loop
foreach
doesn't dispose of all of the objects in the sequence being iterated. It only disposes of the IEnumerator
object that provides you with the objects being iterated over.
Do LINQ IEnumerable extensions call Dispose on their IEnumerable?
Yes, you can rely on the call of Dispose()
on your iterators from inside the methods of LINQ.
In the reference code published by Microsoft, the use of iterators falls in three categories:
- Iterators are used from within a
foreach
loop, which ensures a call ofDispose()
, or - Iterators are used in conjunction with a
while
loop; these iterators are disposed explicitly - Iterators are obtained inside a
using
block, which ensures automatic disposal.
In all these cases the library ensures that iterator's Dispose()
method is called upon completion.
When is Dispose() of a class implementing IEnumeratorT called automatically by Linq?
None of your code creates any enumerators that you are responsible for disposing of. LINQ operators like Count
are designed so that they create and dispose the enumerators internally, so you don't have to worry about it at all.
You can see the reference source for Count
here, and you'll find the snippet:
int count = 0;
using (IEnumerator<TSource> e = source.GetEnumerator())
{
checked
{
while (e.MoveNext())
{
count++;
}
}
}
return count;
The using
statement already disposes the enumerator for you - Dispose
is called, before Count
even returns. There's nothing for you to do.
Of course, if you are consuming stringsFound
by getting its enumerator (though it's very rare that you'd need to do it this way), you do need to remember to dispose it.
var stringsFoundEnumerator = stringsFound.GetEnumerator();
// ^^^^^^ remember to dispose this!
Side note: foreach
loops translates to while
loops wrapped by a using
statement, so you don't need to worry about disposing the enumerator if you are iterating over stringsFound
with a foreach
loop either. :D
You should not call Dispose more than one time on an object (CA2202)
This code analysis warning is total baloney. The contract for IDisposable
requires that extra calls to Dispose
are accepted and do nothing (in particular, they should not throw ObjectDisposedException
or any other exception).
If an object's
Dispose
method is called more than once, the object must ignore all calls after the first one. The object must not throw an exception if itsDispose
method is called multiple times. Instance methods other thanDispose
can throw anObjectDisposedException
when resources are already disposed.
Source: IDisposable.Dispose
documentation on MSDN
Unfortunately some framework code was written without reading the contract, and forbids calling Dispose more than once. Those objects you should be careful not to double dispose. But the universal contract is still that for an arbitrary IDisposable
, calling Dispose
multiple times is permitted.
Combining foreach and using
foreach (ManagementObject result in results)
using(result)
{
//code here
}
It's not normally good practice to assign the variable outside the using
block because the resource would be disposed but could stay in scope. It would, however, result in clearer code here because you can nested the using
statement against the foreach
.
EDIT:As pointed out in another answer, ManagementObjectCollection
also implements IDisposable
so I have added that into a using
block.
No need to place ManagementObjectCollection
in a using statement. the foreach
will call Dispose()
on the enumerator.
Related Topics
Questions About Entity Framework Context Lifetime
Equivalent of Tuple (.Net 4) for .Net Framework 3.5
How to Hide Public Methods from Intellisense
C# MACro Definitions in Preprocessor
Convert String to Brushes/Brush Color Name in C#
Why Gettype Returns System.Int32 Instead of Nullable<Int32>
Can You Access UI Elements from Another Thread? (Get Not Set)
Custom Sort Logic in Orderby Using Linq
Newtonsoft.JSON Assembly Package Version Mismatch
Accuracy of Textrenderer.Measuretext Results
Should Idisposable.Dispose() Be Made Safe to Call Multiple Times
C# Httpwebrequest the Underlying Connection Was Closed: an Unexpected Error Occurred on a Send
Create Http Post Request and Receive Response Using C# Console Application
Thread with Multiple Parameters
Requesting HTML Over Https with C# Webclient
Piping in a File on the Command-Line Using System.Diagnostics.Process