What Is the Em Font-Size Unit? How Much Is It in Pixels

What is the em font-size unit? How much is it in pixels?

Despite what you may read elsewhere, there is no direct relationship between em and px.

As one of the links states:

the "em" value is based
on the width of the uppercase M

So it's going to be different for every font. A narrow font might have the same height (in px) as an extended font, but the em size will be different.

EDIT three years later:

There are now lots of sources which say that 1em = font size (in px). That is, when you write font-size:16px, then 1em = 16px. This still doesn't agree with the Adobe source (which says 1em = the font size in pt), but in either case it seems bizarre; the em size would be far too large with condensed fonts and far too small with extended fonts.

I'm going to make some test pages and see for myself.

And also:

I see that nobody (including me) actually answered the question (which was kind of hidden):

I also read somewhere about some ie bug and to overcome that set body font-size to something

According to this page, you need to add this to your css: html{ font-size:100%; }. That page is six years old, and I haven't read the (hundreds) of comments, so I don't know if it's still relevant.

Why em instead of px?

The reason I asked this question was that I forgot how to use em's as it was a while I was hacking happily in CSS. People didn't notice that I kept the question general as I wasn't talking about sizing fonts per se. I was more interested in how to define styles on any given block element on the page.

As Henrik Paul and others pointed out em is proportional to the font-size used in the element. It's a common practice to define sizes on block elements in px, however, sizing up fonts in browsers usually breaks this design. Resizing fonts is commonly done with the shortcut keys Ctrl++ or Ctrl+-. So a good practice is to use em's instead.

Using px to define the width

Here is an illustrating example. Say we have a div-tag that we want to turn into a stylish date box, we may have HTML-code that looks like this:

<div class="date-box">
    <p class="month">July</p>
    <p class="day">4</p>
</div>

A simple implementation would defining the width of the date-box class in px:

* { margin: 0; padding: 0; }

p.month { font-size: 10pt; }

p.day { font-size: 24pt; font-weight: bold; }

div.date-box {
    background-color: #DD2222;
    font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
    color: white;
    width: 50px;
}

The problem

However, if we want to size the text up in our browser the design will break. The text will also bleed outside the box which is almost the same what happens with SO's design as flodin points out. This is because the box will remain the same size in width as it is locked to 50px.

Using em instead

A smarter way is to define the width in ems instead:

div.date-box {
    background-color: #DD2222;
    font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
    color: white;
    width: 2.5em;
}

* { margin: 0; padding: 0; font-size: 10pt; }

// Initial width of date-box = 10 pt x 2.5 em = 25 pt
// Will also work if you used px instead of pt

That way you have a fluid design on the date-box, i.e. the box will size up together with the text in proportion to the font-size defined for the date-box. In this example, the font-size is defined in * as 10pt and will size up 2.5 times to that font size. So when you're sizing the fonts in the browser, the box will have 2.5 times the size of that font-size.

How font-size em value work?

Using em as measurement value would just not inhert but increases accordingly.

Here's an example:

<div>
  <p>
    <span>foo bar</span>
  </p>
</div>

---

body{
  font-size: 1em;
}
div{
  font-size: 1.5em;/*1.5em of 1em == 1.5em*/
}
div > p{
  font-size: 1.5em;/*1.5em of 1.5em inherited from div == 2.25em*/
}
div > p > span{
  font-size: 1.5em; /*1.5em of 2.25em inherited from p == 3.375em*/
}

So, I would recommend you to use px as measurement value.

---

Use ems to make scalable style sheets only.

---

If you want to know more about px, em, and % please follow this link and this link

Is sizing fonts using em still relevant?

Do not specify the font-size in absolute length units for screen stylesheets. They render inconsistently across platforms and can't be resized by the User Agent (e.g browser). Keep the usage of such units for styling on media with fixed and known physical properties (e.g print)

If you will use this method, no need to calculate

You can set the font-size of the body to 62.5%(that is 62.5% of the default of 16px), which equates to 10px, or 0.625EMs. Now you can set your font-size in EMs with an easy to remember conversion, divide the px by 10.

* 12px = 1.2EMs
* 13px = 1.3EMs
* 16px = 1.6EMs
* 8px = 0.8EMs
* etc…

This makes everything SUPER easy to remember and eliminates the need for conversion tables. Of course, you will still need to use a conversion table for nested elements when using EMs, if you are not being specific in your CSS, which is a whole separate issue.

But 76% is much better and you can use this to calculate http://pxtoem.com/

Yes it's still relevant:

IE6 is still widely used and is unable to resize the fonts defined in px. => Usability issues. That alone is a no-no.

and

IE 7 and 8 don't resize text sized with pixels either, actually. They do have page zoom, but some people prefer to incease text size only.

Here's a summary of what's good and bad about font sizing in general.

Font size in css http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/213/2470522253.png

I personally like ems. Others, like Chris Coyier over at CSS-Tricks.com likes pixels. (Chris has an excellent article on the different font units).

It really comes down to personal preference.

Almost similar or related questions on SO

Should we still use em and % for defining the font-size of the website elements?

Is there really any point to using relative font sizing in CSS?

Why em instead of px?

Font size in CSS - % or em?

CSS font size: relative vs. absolute values. Which to use?

Problem with EM

Using relative instead of fixed size in CSS

Helpful online tool for px to em

http://pxtoem.com/

http://riddle.pl/emcalc/

http://convert-to.com/pixels-px-to-em-conversion.html

Convert entire site from px to em (This tool is still in development)

http://converter.elementagency.com/

EM Calculator AIR application (will work on all os)

http://jameswhittaker.com/journal/em-based-layouts-vertical-rhythm-calculator/

http://jameswhittaker.com/projects/apps/em-calculator-air-application/

Windows apps

http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/11/16/pixem-pixel-to-em-converter/

http://www.storkas.com/Projects.aspx(go at bottom)

Pixels to Ems Conversion Table for CSS

http://jontangerine.com/silo/css/pixels-to-ems/

http://reeddesign.co.uk/test/points-pixels.html

emchart

http://aloestudios.com/tools/emchart/

http://aloestudios.com/code/emchart/

Some more articles on this issue

http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/type.html

How is font size calculated?

See the spec:

The font size corresponds to the em
square, a concept used in typography.

Note that certain glyphs may bleed
outside their em squares.

What is the difference between px, em and ex?

1. Pixels (px) are browser dependent. It is the absolute size that you would see on your screen.
2. Em are sort of like percentages. Ems is referring to the base text size. The value of 1 em means the same thing as a value of 100 percent. But you can also say it in the opposite way: A percentage value is just an em multiplied by 100.
3. Points(pt) are what you would want to use in print media.

Font size in pixels and as fractional number

yes the above syntax .text { font-size:10.25684789px; } will be support in browsers too....

How many pixels is 1em in IE8?

Isn't 1em supposed to be 16px across all browsers?

Not necessarily:

One 'Em'(1em) is equal to the height of the capital letter "M" in the default font size. When applied in CSS, the Em represents either the user's default font size, or the size of the parent element's font size, if one is available.

So while the default font size is 16px, perhaps you have a different size set on IE.

Also you may have some obscure parent element that is overriding it.

More info

---

Related Topics