Shuffling a List of Objects

Shuffling a list of objects

random.shuffle should work. Here's an example, where the objects are lists:

from random import shuffle

x = [[i] for i in range(10)]
shuffle(x)
print(x)

# print(x) gives [[9], [2], [7], [0], [4], [5], [3], [1], [8], [6]]

Note that shuffle works in place, and returns None.

More generally in Python, mutable objects can be passed into functions, and when a function mutates those objects, the standard is to return None (rather than, say, the mutated object).

Shuffling a list inside an object in Python

random.shuffle performs the shuffle operation on the list argument - it doesn't return a new list. You need to generate a new list first of all, and then use shuffle to shuffle it:

new_list = self.number_of_packs * self.cards
random.shuffle(new_list)
print(new_list)

Randomizing a list in Python

from random import shuffle

list1 = [1,2,3,4,5]
shuffle(list1)

print list1
---> [3, 1, 2, 4, 5]

Shuffle the list of Objects java stream

You can do in-place shuffling. For that, you don't need to create extra Word objects.

private void shuffle(List<Word> words) {
List<String> meanings = words.stream()
.map(Word::getMeaning)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
Collections.shuffle(meanings);

for(int i = 0; i < words.size(); i++) {
words.get(i).setMeaning(meanings.get(i));
}
}

Shuffle ArrayList of objects

Hi Sumit i dont know why there are few downvote it is because you have not informed that you are new to Java Language
Please find my answer below

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;

final class Product {
private final String name;
private final Double price;
private final Double discount;

Product(String name, Double price, Double discount) {
this.name = name;
this.price = price;
this.discount = discount;
}

@Override
public String toString() {
return "{name=" + name + ", price=" + price + ", discount=" + discount + "}";
}
}

public final class Main {

public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Product> products = new ArrayList<>();
products.add(new Product("Watch", 45.99, 9.99));
products.add(new Product("Keyboard", 21.99, 3.99));
products.add(new Product("Mouse", 99.99, 4.99));

System.out.println("Original items Before shuffle are");
products.forEach(System.out::println);

Collections.shuffle(products);
System.out.println("Original items After shuffle are");
products.forEach(System.out::println);
}
}

How to lightly shuffle a list in python

to show what some of these solutions are doing I find it helps to run a monte-carlo algorithm many times and look at the distribution

first a tidied up version of @meta4's solution as it was the most fleshed out:

from random import randrange

def partial_shuffle(l, factor=5):
n = len(l)
for _ in range(factor):
a, b = randrange(n), randrange(n)
l[b], l[a] = l[a], l[b]

which we can run many times by doing:

import numpy as np

n = 8
orig = list(range(n))
occur = np.zeros((n, n), int)

for _ in range(100000):
x = orig[:]
partial_shuffle(x,1)
occur[orig,x] += 1

if we print out the occurrences table as percentages we get:

[[33.5  9.6  9.5  9.4  9.4  9.6  9.5  9.5]
[ 9.6 33.2 9.7 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.4 9.4]
[ 9.5 9.6 33.2 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.6 9.5]
[ 9.5 9.3 9.6 33.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.6]
[ 9.4 9.6 9.4 9.6 33.3 9.5 9.7 9.5]
[ 9.6 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.4 33.3 9.5 9.6]
[ 9.4 9.7 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.6 33.2 9.7]
[ 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.7 9.5 9.6 33.2]]

each row represents the probability of the item moving to the column. in this case (when n=8) the algorithm will tend to leave elements where they were ~33% of the time, and then pick the remainder uniformly

I can then run (a tidied up) version of pjs's code with:

from random import gauss

orderliness = 2

occur = np.zeros((n, n), int)

for _ in range(100000):
x = sorted(orig, key=lambda i: gauss(i * orderliness, 1))
occur[orig,x] += 1

which gives very different output:

[[91.9  7.9  0.1  0.   0.   0.   0.   0. ]
[ 7.9 84.1 7.8 0.1 0. 0. 0. 0. ]
[ 0.1 7.8 84.1 7.9 0.1 0. 0. 0. ]
[ 0. 0.1 7.9 84.1 7.7 0.1 0. 0. ]
[ 0. 0. 0.1 7.7 84.2 7.8 0.1 0. ]
[ 0. 0. 0. 0.1 7.9 84.2 7.7 0.1]
[ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.1 7.7 84.2 7.9]
[ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.1 7.9 91.9]]

i.e. items tend to remain close to where they started

this sort of table is great at detecting bias in the distribution, which there doesn't seem to be evidence of above. but, for example, with Artyom's solution (shuffle(x, lambda: random() / 5)) gives the following:

[[  0.   37.4   0.    0.    0.   16.7  23.8  22.1]
[ 0. 0. 100. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ]
[ 0. 0. 0. 100. 0. 0. 0. 0. ]
[ 0. 0. 0. 0. 100. 0. 0. 0. ]
[ 1.7 0. 0. 0. 0. 83.3 11.9 3. ]
[ 9. 7.4 0. 0. 0. 0. 64.2 19.4]
[ 26.7 17.9 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 55.5]
[ 62.6 37.4 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ]]

which probably isn't what the OP wanted. the high probability off diagonal represents rotating the array by one element

Randomize a List<T>

Shuffle any (I)List with an extension method based on the Fisher-Yates shuffle:

private static Random rng = new Random();  

public static void Shuffle<T>(this IList<T> list)
{
int n = list.Count;
while (n > 1) {
n--;
int k = rng.Next(n + 1);
T value = list[k];
list[k] = list[n];
list[n] = value;
}
}

Usage:

List<Product> products = GetProducts();
products.Shuffle();

The code above uses the much criticised System.Random method to select swap candidates. It's fast but not as random as it should be. If you need a better quality of randomness in your shuffles use the random number generator in System.Security.Cryptography like so:

using System.Security.Cryptography;
...
public static void Shuffle<T>(this IList<T> list)
{
RNGCryptoServiceProvider provider = new RNGCryptoServiceProvider();
int n = list.Count;
while (n > 1)
{
byte[] box = new byte[1];
do provider.GetBytes(box);
while (!(box[0] < n * (Byte.MaxValue / n)));
int k = (box[0] % n);
n--;
T value = list[k];
list[k] = list[n];
list[n] = value;
}
}

A simple comparison is available at this blog (WayBack Machine).

Edit: Since writing this answer a couple years back, many people have commented or written to me, to point out the big silly flaw in my comparison. They are of course right. There's nothing wrong with System.Random if it's used in the way it was intended. In my first example above, I instantiate the rng variable inside of the Shuffle method, which is asking for trouble if the method is going to be called repeatedly. Below is a fixed, full example based on a really useful comment received today from @weston here on SO.

Program.cs:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading;

namespace SimpleLottery
{
class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
var numbers = new List<int>(Enumerable.Range(1, 75));
numbers.Shuffle();
Console.WriteLine("The winning numbers are: {0}", string.Join(", ", numbers.GetRange(0, 5)));
}
}

public static class ThreadSafeRandom
{
[ThreadStatic] private static Random Local;

public static Random ThisThreadsRandom
{
get { return Local ?? (Local = new Random(unchecked(Environment.TickCount * 31 + Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId))); }
}
}

static class MyExtensions
{
public static void Shuffle<T>(this IList<T> list)
{
int n = list.Count;
while (n > 1)
{
n--;
int k = ThreadSafeRandom.ThisThreadsRandom.Next(n + 1);
T value = list[k];
list[k] = list[n];
list[n] = value;
}
}
}
}

Shuffling the list inside JSON Array

public static JSONArray shuffleJsonArray (JSONArray array) throws JSONException {
// Implementing Fisher–Yates shuffle
Random rnd = new Random();
for (int i = array.length() - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
int j = rnd.nextInt(i + 1);
// Simple swap
Object object = array.get(j);
array.put(j, array.get(i));
array.put(i, object);
}
return array;
}


Related Topics



Leave a reply



Submit