Origin Is Not Allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin

Origin is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin

I wrote an article on this issue a while back, Cross Domain AJAX.

The easiest way to handle this if you have control of the responding server is to add a response header for:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

This will allow cross-domain Ajax. In PHP, you'll want to modify the response like so:

<?php header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *'); ?>

You can just put the Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin * setting in the Apache configuration or htaccess file.

It should be noted that this effectively disables CORS protection, which very likely exposes your users to attack. If you don't know that you specifically need to use a wildcard, you should not use it, and instead you should whitelist your specific domain:

<?php header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://example.com') ?>

Origin origin is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin

Since they are running on different ports, they are different JavaScript origin. It doesn't matter that they are on the same machine/hostname.

You need to enable CORS on the server (localhost:8080). Check out this site: http://enable-cors.org/

All you need to do is add an HTTP header to the server:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://localhost:3000

Or, for simplicity:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

Thought don't use "*" if your server is trying to set cookie and you use withCredentials = true

when responding to a credentialed request, server must specify a domain, and cannot use wild carding.

You can read more about withCredentials here

Origin is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin' since 2021

We have fixed the issue. you will get "access-control-allow-origin: *" header at the API responses.

your API key (Ocp-Apim-Subscription-Key) is private information, and you should not expose it at the client side.

you should generate access token from your web server using that key and use (send it at Authorization header) it with all your operations request.

please delete it from the example above as well.

No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource—when trying to get data from a REST API

This answer covers a lot of ground, so it’s divided into three parts:

  • How to use a CORS proxy to avoid “No Access-Control-Allow-Origin header” problems
  • How to avoid the CORS preflight
  • How to fix “Access-Control-Allow-Origin header must not be the wildcard” problems

How to use a CORS proxy to avoid “No Access-Control-Allow-Origin header” problems

If you don’t control the server your frontend code is sending a request to, and the problem with the response from that server is just the lack of the necessary Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, you can still get things to work—by making the request through a CORS proxy.

You can easily run your own proxy with code from https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere/.

You can also easily deploy your own proxy to Heroku in just 2-3 minutes, with 5 commands:

git clone https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere.git
cd cors-anywhere/
npm install
heroku create
git push heroku master

After running those commands, you’ll end up with your own CORS Anywhere server running at, e.g., https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/.

Now, prefix your request URL with the URL for your proxy:

https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/https://example.com

Adding the proxy URL as a prefix causes the request to get made through your proxy, which:

  1. Forwards the request to https://example.com.
  2. Receives the response from https://example.com.
  3. Adds the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to the response.
  4. Passes that response, with that added header, back to the requesting frontend code.

The browser then allows the frontend code to access the response, because that response with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header is what the browser sees.

This works even if the request is one that triggers browsers to do a CORS preflight OPTIONS request, because in that case, the proxy also sends the Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods headers needed to make the preflight succeed.


How to avoid the CORS preflight

The code in the question triggers a CORS preflight—since it sends an Authorization header.

https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS#Preflighted_requests

Even without that, the Content-Type: application/json header will also trigger a preflight.

What “preflight” means: before the browser tries the POST in the code in the question, it first sends an OPTIONS request to the server, to determine if the server is opting-in to receiving a cross-origin POST that has Authorization and Content-Type: application/json headers.

It works pretty well with a small curl script - I get my data.

To properly test with curl, you must emulate the preflight OPTIONS the browser sends:

curl -i -X OPTIONS -H "Origin: http://127.0.0.1:3000" \
-H 'Access-Control-Request-Method: POST' \
-H 'Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type, Authorization' \
"https://the.sign_in.url"

…with https://the.sign_in.url replaced by whatever your actual sign_in URL is.

The response the browser needs from that OPTIONS request must have headers like this:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin:  http://127.0.0.1:3000
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type, Authorization

If the OPTIONS response doesn’t include those headers, the browser will stop right there and never attempt to send the POST request. Also, the HTTP status code for the response must be a 2xx—typically 200 or 204. If it’s any other status code, the browser will stop right there.

The server in the question responds to the OPTIONS request with a 501 status code, which apparently means it’s trying to indicate it doesn’t implement support for OPTIONS requests. Other servers typically respond with a 405 “Method not allowed” status code in this case.

So you’ll never be able to make POST requests directly to that server from your frontend JavaScript code if the server responds to that OPTIONS request with a 405 or 501 or anything other than a 200 or 204 or if doesn’t respond with those necessary response headers.

The way to avoid triggering a preflight for the case in the question would be:

  • if the server didn’t require an Authorization request header but instead, e.g., relied on authentication data embedded in the body of the POST request or as a query param
  • if the server didn’t require the POST body to have a Content-Type: application/json media type but instead accepted the POST body as application/x-www-form-urlencoded with a parameter named json (or whatever) whose value is the JSON data

How to fix “Access-Control-Allow-Origin header must not be the wildcard” problems

I am getting another error message:

The value of the 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header in the response
must not be the wildcard '*' when the request's credentials mode is
'include'. Origin 'http://127.0.0.1:3000' is therefore not allowed
access. The credentials mode of requests initiated by the
XMLHttpRequest is controlled by the withCredentials attribute.

For requests that have credentials, browsers won’t let your frontend JavaScript code access the response if the value of the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header is *. Instead the value in that case must exactly match your frontend code’s origin, http://127.0.0.1:3000.

See Credentialed requests and wildcards in the MDN HTTP access control (CORS) article.

If you control the server you’re sending the request to, a common way to deal with this case is to configure the server to take the value of the Origin request header, and echo/reflect that back into the value of the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header; e.g., with nginx:

add_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin $http_origin

But that’s just an example; other (web) server systems have similar ways to echo origin values.



I am using Chrome. I also tried using that Chrome CORS Plugin

That Chrome CORS plugin apparently just simplemindedly injects an Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * header into the response the browser sees. If the plugin were smarter, what it would be doing is setting the value of that fake Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to the actual origin of your frontend JavaScript code, http://127.0.0.1:3000.

So avoid using that plugin, even for testing. It’s just a distraction. To test what responses you get from the server with no browser filtering them, you’re better off using curl -H as above.


As far as the frontend JavaScript code for the fetch(…) request in the question:

headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', 'http://localhost:3000');
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true');

Remove those lines. The Access-Control-Allow-* headers are response headers. You never want to send them in requests. The only effect of that is to trigger a browser to do a preflight.

Why does my JavaScript code receive a No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource error, while Postman does not?

If I understood it right you are doing an XMLHttpRequest to a different domain than your page is on. So the browser is blocking it as it usually allows a request in the same origin for security reasons. You need to do something different when you want to do a cross-domain request.

When you are using Postman they are not restricted by this policy. Quoted from Cross-Origin XMLHttpRequest:

Regular web pages can use the XMLHttpRequest object to send and receive data from remote servers, but they're limited by the same origin policy. Extensions aren't so limited. An extension can talk to remote servers outside of its origin, as long as it first requests cross-origin permissions.

Origin http://localhost is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin.?

You've got two ways to go forward:

JSONP


If this API supports JSONP, the easiest way to fix this issue is to add &callback to the end of the URL. You can also try &callback=. If that doesn't work, it means the API does not support JSONP, so you must try the other solution.

Proxy Script


You can create a proxy script on the same domain as your website in order to avoid the cross-origin issues. This will only work with HTTP URLs, not HTTPS URLs, but it shouldn't be too difficult to modify if you need that.

<?php
// File Name: proxy.php
if (!isset($_GET['url'])) {
die(); // Don't do anything if we don't have a URL to work with
}
$url = urldecode($_GET['url']);
$url = 'http://' . str_replace('http://', '', $url); // Avoid accessing the file system
echo file_get_contents($url); // You should probably use cURL. The concept is the same though

Then you just call this script with jQuery. Be sure to urlencode the URL.

$.ajax({
url : 'proxy.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.master18.tiket.com%2Fsearch%2Fautocomplete%2Fhotel%3Fq%3Dmah%26token%3D90d2fad44172390b11527557e6250e50%26secretkey%3D83e2f0484edbd2ad6fc9888c1e30ea44%26output%3Djson',
type : 'GET',
dataType : 'json'
}).done(function(data) {
console.log(data.results.result[1].category); // Do whatever you want here
});

The Why


You're getting this error because of XMLHttpRequest same origin policy, which basically boils down to a restriction of ajax requests to URLs with a different port, domain or protocol. This restriction is in place to prevent cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

More Information

Our solutions by pass these problems in different ways.

JSONP uses the ability to point script tags at JSON (wrapped in a javascript function) in order to receive the JSON. The JSONP page is interpreted as javascript, and executed. The JSON is passed to your specified function.

The proxy script works by tricking the browser, as you're actually requesting a page on the same origin as your page. The actual cross-origin requests happen server-side.

Origin 'url' is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin

Ajax requests are limited by the browser's Same Origin Policy. In a nutshell, that means that you can't talk directly to a server via ajax that isn't on the same domain as the page your script is running in. So, unless you're developing a page for google.com, you can't talk to google.com directly.

There are work-arounds for this limitation involving the insertion of script tags (JS files loaded via script tags are not subject to the same origin policy) and then using JSONP callbacks to communicate data results back to your main script from those script tags. That is probably what you need to do here if the API you're attempting to use supports it.

jQuery will help you a lot here as it can automatically turn an ajax call into a JSONP call that is loaded via script tags and can work in cross domain situations. According to the jQuery doc for it's ajax function, it will do this automatically if it sees "callback=" in the parameter string for the ajax call or if you set the crossDomain option.

How does the 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header work?

Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (cross-origin resource sharing) header.

When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.

For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com

Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.

Non-simple requests

What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):

  • using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
  • using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
  • Accept
  • Accept-Language
  • Content-Language
  • Content-Type (this is only simple when its value is application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data, or text/plain)

If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.

Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:

OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type

Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type

When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).

The browsers sends the actual request:

PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type: application/json

{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }

And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com

See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.



Related Topics



Leave a reply



Submit