VB.NET equivalent for C# 'dynamic' with Option Strict On
The equivalent is Object in VB.NET but with Option Strict Off
. With Option Strict On
there's no equivalent. Put another way the dynamic keyword brings Option Strict Off
equivalent functionality to C#.
Is there an equivalent of dynamic type in VB.NET or other way to achieve the same behavior?
No equivalent for dynamic
in VB.NET, the return type must be Object
. There is no support in the CLR either, but all that is really needed here is to convince the C# compiler that "Object" must be interpreted as "dynamic". In other words, you need to do in VB.NET what the C# compiler does to annotate the return type in the metadata. That merely takes an attribute, like this:
Public Function findById(id As String) As <System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Dynamic> Object
Return session.FindById(id)
End Function
.NET 4.0 framework dynamic features in VB with Option Strict On?
It appears you can't without having to turn Option Strict off.
I'll research some more though.
Edit
After going through some documentation on the ExpandoObject
, it appears it is used in C# for COM and Office Interop. Traditionally, in VB.NET, the Object
was used for such purposes and that would require you turn off Option Strict.
To answer your question this means that you can use dynamic types in VB.NET by using the Object
type instead of the ExpandoObject
[if such a type exists in VB.NET], set Option Infer On
and Option Strict On or Off.
You could also consider using partial classes to localise your non Option Strict code to particular files.
Suggested Reading
- Dynamic Type in C#, Equivalent in VB
- Using Type Dynamic (C# Programming Guide)
Option Strict On disallows implicit conversions from 'String ' to 'Char' VB.NET
Please continue to use Option Strict On
. It is annoying but it will save your day a lot.
For your problem:
It is caused by the fact that when you enable Option Strict On
, the compiler is no longer allowed to take the first char from your string and use it as separator. Because there is no overload for string.Split
that takes just a string, then it complains about an attempt to an do invalid conversion.
If you want to use a string as separator then it is required to pass an array of strings as the first parameter, and a second parameter of type StringSplitOptions
is required.
Fixing it is really simple. Just change the line to:
For Each entry In returnedString.Split({".exe"}, StringSplitOptions.None)
Enforce datatypes passed to methods (Option Strict)
Selectively Turn on Option Strict
Add to the top of the code file:
Option Strict On
Since this will enforce the option only in those files, this method is not recommended on an ongoing basis because it requires you to remember to do so for each file.
Project Wide
Open Project Properties (Project Menu - Properties among others). On the Compile Tab set the Option Strict
drop down to On. You can also demote some conditions from an error to a warning or ignore that condition.
This too can be forgotten.
Visual Studio Default (recommended)
You can make Option Strict On
the default setting for all new projects, so you don't have to remember to do so at any level:
Tools Menu -> Projects and Solutions -> VB Defaults
This wont affect a project already in the works - use #2 for that.
Related Topics
C# Okay with Comparing Value Types to Null
Temporarily Clear the Terminal in Linux
JSON.Net Throws Stackoverflowexception When Using [JSONconvert()]
Is There a Way of Setting Culture for a Whole Application? All Current Threads and New Threads
ASP.NET MVC Custom Error Handling Application_Error Global.Asax
All Possible Combinations of a List of Values
Windows Like Services Development in Linux Using Mono
Most Elegant Way to Generate Prime Numbers
Using String Format to Show Decimal Up to 2 Places or Simple Integer
How to Read a Specified Line in a Text File
How to Open Visual Studio Code with Admin Privileges to Make Effect of the Installed Extensions
How to Get and Set Environment Variables in C#