How can I tell Moq to return a Task?
Your method doesn't have any callbacks so there is no reason to use .CallBack()
. You can simply return a Task with the desired values using .Returns()
and Task.FromResult, e.g.:
MyType someValue=...;
mock.Setup(arg=>arg.DoSomethingAsync())
.Returns(Task.FromResult(someValue));
Update 2014-06-22
Moq 4.2 has two new extension methods to assist with this.
mock.Setup(arg=>arg.DoSomethingAsync())
.ReturnsAsync(someValue);
mock.Setup(arg=>arg.DoSomethingAsync())
.ThrowsAsync(new InvalidOperationException());
Update 2016-05-05
As Seth Flowers mentions in the other answer, ReturnsAsync
is only available for methods that return a Task<T>
. For methods that return only a Task,
.Returns(Task.FromResult(default(object)))
can be used.
As shown in this answer, in .NET 4.6 this is simplified to .Returns(Task.CompletedTask);
, e.g.:
mock.Setup(arg=>arg.DoSomethingAsync())
.Returns(Task.CompletedTask);
How to return a Taskstring using Moq?
Use Task.FromResult(expected)
mock.Setup(arg => arg.GetScoreByTotalWeighting(value)).Returns(Task.FromResult(expected))
also I'd recomend to avoid value
as parameter, when you dont care about that paramter when returning result. You can use It.IsAny<int>()
, like that:
mock.Setup(arg => arg.GetScoreByTotalWeighting(It.IsAny<int>())).Returns(Task.FromResult(expected))
Problem that you setting up mock.Setup(arg => arg.GetScoreByTotalWeighting(value))
with value == 0
and then call survey.GetResult(score)
with 50
. Use It.IsAny<int>()
at both places to avoid that problem, or pass same value:
mock.Setup(arg => arg.GetScoreByTotalWeighting(score))
Solution:
public async Task GetResult()
{
//Arrange
string expected = "test";
var mock = new Mock<IRetreiveQuestionRepository>();
mock.Setup(arg => arg.GetScoreByTotalWeighting(It.IsAny<int>()))
.ReturnsAsync(expected);
var survey = new SurveyResult(mock.Object);
//Act
string result = await survey.GetResult(It.IsAny<int>());
//Assert
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
}
Return Task with moq
Thanks to Liam and CodeCaster.
Seems like there is no need for incompleted Task
s. Works fine with mocking up with Task.FromResult();
Something like
var sourceDto = new SourceOneDto {data: "one"};
_sourceServiceMock.Setup(s => s.ReturnA()).Returns(Task.FromResult(sourceDto));
//This might work as well
_sourceServiceMock.Setup(s => s.ReturnA()).ReturnsAsync(sourceDto);
Moq Framework to unit test a method that returns a task
Mock returns false, because when you call HttpPost
parameters don't match with ones that were set up. The second parameter is different.
You can set up mock like that:
mock
.Setup(x => x.HttpPost("http://test.com", It.IsAny<StringContent>(), "token"))
.Returns(Task.FromResult(true)); //or .ReturnsAsync(true);
It tells mocking framework, that second parameter can be any object of type StringContent
.
Docs can be found here: https://github.com/Moq/moq4/wiki/Quickstart#matching-arguments
Moq with Task await
DoSomething
returns null
instead of returning a Task
, and so you get an exception when awaiting it. You need to specify when building the mock that it should return a Task
.
In this case it seems that you can simply return an already completed task using Task.FromResult
so the mock setup should look like this:
this._mockService.Setup(...).Returns(Task.FromResult(false));
Beginning with the next version of .Net (4.6) you can use Task.CompletedTask
like this:
this._mockService.Setup(...).Returns(Task.CompletedTask);
How do I setup an async method which only returns a Task in strict mode in Moq 4.13.1?
A Task
is still needed to allow the await
to flow to completion when exercising the test.
So it needs to be setup to return a Task
.
Task.CompletedTask
can be used for this
//...
_service
.Setup(m => m.IReturnATask(It.Any<Guid>()))
.Returns(Task.CompletedTask);
//...
How to mock which return type is 'async Task(IListModelClass, PaginationModel)'?
The methods of the It
class, like Is
or IsAny
, should be used only inside the Setup
method.
They help you specify when your mock should "trigger".
If your method returns with a Task
then you have several options
ReturnAsync
var expectedJobLicensePaths = ...;
var expectedPaginationModel = ...;
mockIJobLicensePathService
.Setup(x => x.GetJobPathByFilters(It.IsAny<PathSearch>()))
.ReturnsAsync((expectedJobLicensePaths, expectedPaginationModel));
Result
+ Return
Since 4.16 you can rewrite the above setup to this
var expectedJobLicensePaths = ...;
var expectedPaginationModel = ...;
mockIJobLicensePathService
.Setup(x => x.GetJobPathByFilters(It.IsAny<PathSearch>()).Result)
.Returns((expectedJobLicensePaths, expectedPaginationModel));
How to filter by an expression when mocking a repository with Moq
Let's start with the basics:
- Dummy: simple code that returns bogus data
- Fake: a working alternative which can take shortcuts
- Stub: custom logic with predefined data
- Mock: custom logic with expectations (interactive stub)
- Shim: custom logic at run-time (replace static with a delegate)
- Spy: interceptors to record calls
So, your mock is an interactive stub which means it can return different outputs based on the received input. In your Setup
call you have made the following statement: whatever I receive as a filter expression I should always return with the entire list
If you want to apply the filter then change your setup
.Setup(x => x.GetAsync(It.IsAny<Expression<Func<Airline, bool>>>()))
.ReturnsAsync(filter => GetTestAirlines.Where(filter));
Now if you assert on airlineDtoList.Count
then it will return 2. But in this case you are not testing the GetAllAsync
function rather than your mock.
So, I would rather spend more time testing the // some logic
You can also take advantage of async
-await
in your test
[Fact]
public Task AirlineService_GetAll_ReturnsAirlines()
{
//Arrange
var mockAirlineRepo = new MockAirlineRepository().MockGetAll();
var airlineService = new AirlineService(mockAirlineRepo.Object, _airlineMapper);
//Act
var response = await airlineService.GetAllAsync();
var result = response.Data;
//Assert
...
}
XUnit Test Moq failing
The problem is because you are returning a fixed value
_mockRepo.Setup(x => x.CountAsync()).ReturnsAsync(list.Count);
The above is the same as
_mockRepo.Setup(x => x.CountAsync()).ReturnsAsync(7);
it will return 7 every time since it was setup with a fixed value.
Use a function/delegate that will be invoked every time the expected member is called.
[Fact]
public async Task ServerAccess_Created() {
var list = MockData.GetServerAccessList(); // 7 test records
_mockRepo
.Setup(x => x.CountAsync())
.ReturnsAsync(() => list.Count); //delegate invoked each time
_mockRepo
.Setup(x => x.Add(It.IsAny<ServerAccess>()))
.Callback(ServerAccess item => list.Add(item)); //delegate invoked each time
_mockUnitOfWork
.Setup(x => x.Repository<ServerAccess>())
.Returns(_mockRepo.Object); //fixed value
int before = await _mockRepo.Object.CountAsync();
CreateHandler sut = new CreateHandler(_mockUnitOfWork.Object);
await sut.Execute(new CreateCommand() {
AccessMethod = "New server access method",
Description = "New description"
});
int after = await _mockRepo.Object.CountAsync();
// Assert
Assert.True(after == 8);
}
However, the above test should be simplified to assert the actual expected behavior based on the subject under test
[Fact]
public async Task ServerAccess_Created() {
//Arrange
_mockUnitOfWork
.Setup(x => x.Repository<ServerAccess>())
.Returns(_mockRepo.Object);
CreateHandler sut = new CreateHandler(_mockUnitOfWork.Object);
//Act
await sut.Execute(new CreateCommand() {
AccessMethod = "New server access method",
Description = "New description"
});
// Assert
_mockRepo.Verify(x => x.Add(It.IsAny<ServerAccess>());
}
Using Moq to mock an asynchronous method for a unit test
You're creating a task but never starting it, so it's never completing. However, don't just start the task - instead, change to using Task.FromResult<TResult>
which will give you a task which has already completed:
...
.Returns(Task.FromResult(new HttpResponseMessage(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.OK)));
Note that you won't be testing the actual asynchrony this way - if you want to do that, you need to do a bit more work to create a Task<T>
that you can control in a more fine-grained manner... but that's something for another day.
You might also want to consider using a fake for IHttpClient
rather than mocking everything - it really depends on how often you need it.
Related Topics
C#: Convert Byte Array into a Float
Implementing Hoey Shamos Algorithm with C#
Owin Security - How to Implement Oauth2 Refresh Tokens
When Should I Use the Hashset<T> Type
Comparing Timer with Dispatchertimer
Performance of Find() VS. Firstordefault()
How to Support Listbox Selecteditems Binding with Mvvm in a Navigable Application
Deserialize JSON in a "Tryparse" Way
Hot Unload/Reload of a Dll Used by an Application
Accordion in Windows Forms Datagridview
How to Use Default Serialization in a Custom System.Text.JSON JSONconverter
Single Click Edit in Wpf Datagrid
Convert Rows from a Data Reader into Typed Results
Should I Use Appdomain.Currentdomain.Basedirectory or System.Environment.Currentdirectory