What is the property block declaration equivalent in swift of the following block property?
The corresponding closure property would be declared as
class MyClass {
var completion : ((MyObject) -> Void)? // or ...! for an implicitly unwrapped optional
}
You can set the property like
completion = {
(obj : MyObject) -> Void in
// do something with obj ...
}
which can be shortened (due to the automatic type inference) to
completion = {
obj in
// do something with obj ...
}
swift : Closure declaration as like block declaration
The syntax for function types is (in) -> out
.
typealias CompletionBlock = (NSString?) -> Void
// or
typealias CompletionBlock = (result: NSData?, error: NSError?) -> Void
var completion: CompletionBlock = { reason in print(reason) }
var completion: CompletionBlock = { result, error in print(error) }
Note that the parentheses around the input type are only required as of Swift 3+.
swift : Closure declaration as like block declaration
The syntax for function types is (in) -> out
.
typealias CompletionBlock = (NSString?) -> Void
// or
typealias CompletionBlock = (result: NSData?, error: NSError?) -> Void
var completion: CompletionBlock = { reason in print(reason) }
var completion: CompletionBlock = { result, error in print(error) }
Note that the parentheses around the input type are only required as of Swift 3+.
Can I use Objective-C blocks as properties?
@property (nonatomic, copy) void (^simpleBlock)(void);
@property (nonatomic, copy) BOOL (^blockWithParamter)(NSString *input);
If you are going to be repeating the same block in several places use a type def
typedef void(^MyCompletionBlock)(BOOL success, NSError *error);
@property (nonatomic) MyCompletionBlock completion;
How to implement block property of Objective C category
It isn't clear what you are trying to do. Are you trying to implement a map
type function on NSArray
? If so, then there is no need for an @property
, which would imply that you are storing something associated with they instance. You probably just want a method:
typedef id __nullable (^bt_MapBlockT)(id __nonnull);
- (NSArray *)bt_map:(bt_MapBlockT) block;
// written in browser... probably hosed the syntax slightly.
There are a slew of examples floating about that implement map-reduce-filter-whatever on NSArray, btw.
How to declare a block with arguments in swift?
The equivalent of Objective-C blocks are swift closures, so it would go as follows
{ (user: PFUser, error: NSError) in
if (!user) {
println("Uh oh. The user cancelled the Facebook login.");
} else if (user.isNew) {
println("User signed up and logged in through Facebook!");
} else {
println("User logged in through Facebook!");
}
}
Swift let computed property to Objective C syntax
This is not a computed property. This is a “closure”.
So this defines a type alias for a closure that takes a Float
as a parameter and returns a Float
:
typealias Signal = (Float) -> (Float)
You can create an instance of this Signal
closure like so:
let doubler: Signal = { $0 * 2 }
And you can call that closure like so:
print(doubler(21)) // 42
The equivalent Objective-C syntax to define the type for a “block”:
typedef float (^Signal)(float);
To create an instance of a Signal
block:
Signal doubler = ^(float input) {
return input * 2;
};
And to call it:
NSLog(@"%f", doubler(21)); // 42
Objective C callbacks with blocks
In Objective-C, that would look something like:
touchableObject.touched = ^(id o) { /* handler code */ };
Assuming touched is a property of an appropiate block type. If you re-use a block type (think of Func in C#), it makes sense to typedef it, since a block declaration in ObjC tends to become difficult to read very quickly.
The block syntax gets some time to get used to in Objective-C when you are coming from another language with slightly more elegant block/lambda syntax. To learn and as a reference, see this previous answer, which has helped me a lot.
To typedef a type for touched, you would use something like:
typedef void (^Handler)(id parameter);
Then simply declare the touched property as type handler.
Assigning a swift closure (block equivalent) to an existing objective-c block being accessed using a bridge
All pointers to objects in objective-C must be Optional in swift because a pointer can be nil. If you know that the variable will never actually be nil, you should use Implicitly Unwrapped Optionals (TypeName!
) so that you don't have to unwrap it.
So
void(^performBlock)( UIStoryboardSegue* segue, UIViewController* svc, UIViewController* dvc )
becomes:
{(segue : UIStoryboardSegue!, svc : UIViewController!, dvc : UIViewController!) in
// Implementation
}
If the variable might be nil, you should use a normal Optional which would look like this:
{(segue : UIStoryboardSegue?, svc : UIViewController?, dvc : UIViewController?) in
// Implementation
}
And actually, if you are assigning it to that property, you don't even have to specify the types (they are inferred):
{(segue, svc, dvc) in
// Implementation
}
Related Topics
How to Get Unmanaged Object from Realm Query in Swift
Self.Image.Frame.Width = 20 Give Get Only Property Error
Error: Bool Is Not Convertible to Void:
How to Filter on an Array of Objects in Swift
Able to Write/Read File But Unable to Delete File Swift
In Swift, What Does This Specific Syntax Mean
Using Swift Library in Xamarin
Iterating Through an Enum in Swift 3.0
Error Handling in Swift Does Not Involve Stack Unwinding. What Does It Mean
Detail View Is Not Updated When the Model Is Updated (Using List) Swiftui
Get Url to a Local File with Spm (Swift Package Manager)
Error When Using Generic as Property Type in Swift
How to Rotate Object in a Scene with Pan Gesture - Scenekit
Swift Programmatically Set Segues
How to Make Protocol Associated Type Require Protocol Inheritance and Not Protocol Adoption
Testing an Executable with Swift
Iterating with for .. in on a Changing Collection
How to Programmatically Change the Alpha of a Uivisualeffectview in a Navigationbar