Rails: Render View from Outside Controller

Rails: Render view from outside controller

In Rails 5:

view = ActionView::Base.new(ActionController::Base.view_paths)
view.render(file: 'template.html.erb')

In Rails 6.1:

lookup_context = ActionView::LookupContext.new(ActionController::Base.view_paths)
context = ActionView::Base.with_empty_template_cache.new(lookup_context, {}, nil)

renderer = ActionView::Renderer.new(lookup_context)
renderer.render(context, { file: 'app/views/template.html.erb' })
  • ActionView::Renderer.new() takes a lookup_context arg, and render() method takes a context, so we set those up first
  • ActionView::Base is the default ActiveView context, and must be initialized with with_empty_template_cache method, else render() will error
  • The {}, nil are required assigns and controller args, which used to default to {}, nil in Rails 5
  • Rails 6.1 requires a full filepath file: 'app/views/template.html', whereas Rails 5 only required the filename

Rails, How to render a view/partial in a model


proper solution

Well, "they" are right. You really have to do the rendering in a controller -
but it's fair game to call that controller from a model! Fortunately, AbstractController
in Rails 3 makes it easier than I thought. I wound up making a simple
ActionPusher class, working just like ActionMailer. Perhaps I'll get ambitious and
make this a proper gem someday, but this should serve as a good start for anyone else in my shoes.

I got the most help from this link: http://www.amberbit.com/blog/2011/12/27/render-views-and-partials-outside-controllers-in-rails-3/

in lib/action_pusher.rb

class ActionPusher < AbstractController::Base
include AbstractController::Rendering
include AbstractController::Helpers
include AbstractController::Translation
include AbstractController::AssetPaths
include Rails.application.routes.url_helpers
helper ApplicationHelper
self.view_paths = "app/views"

class Pushable
def initialize(channel, pushtext)
@channel = channel
@pushtext = pushtext
end

def push
Pusher[@channel].trigger('rjs_push', @pushtext )
end
end
end

in app/pushers/users_pusher.rb. I guess the require could go somewhere more global?

require 'action_pusher'

class UsersPusher < ActionPusher
def initialize(user)
@user = user
end

def channel
@user.pusher_key
end

def add_notice(notice = nil)
@notice = notice
Pushable.new channel, render(template: 'users_pusher/add_notice')
end
end

Now in my model, I can just do this:

after_commit :push_add_notice

private

def push_add_notice
UsersPusher.new(user).add_notice(self).push
end

and then you'll want a partial, e.g. app/views/users_pusher/add_notice.js.haml, which could be as simple as:

alert('#{@notice.body}')

I guess you don't really need to do it with Pushable inner class and the .push
call at the end, but I wanted to make it look like ActiveMailer. I also have a
pusher_key method on my user model, to make a channel for each user - but this
is my first day with anything like Pusher, so I can't say for sure if that's the right
strategy. There's more to be fleshed out, but this is enough for me to get started.

Good luck!

(this was my first draft answer, leaving it in because it might help someone)

I've got the general outline of a solution working. Like this, in your model:

after_create :push_new_message

private

def render_anywhere(partial, assigns = {})
view = ActionView::Base.new(ActionController::Base.view_paths, assigns)
view.extend ApplicationHelper
view.render(:partial => partial)
end

def push_new_message
pushstring = render_anywhere('notices/push_new_message', :message_text => self.body)
Pusher[user.pusher_key].trigger!('new_message', pushstring)
end

that is definitely working - the template is rendering, and gets eval()'ed on the client side successfully. I'm planning to clean it up, almost certainly move render_anywhere somewhere more general, and probably try something like this

I can see that pushes will need their own templates, calling the generally available ones, and I may try to collect them all in one place. One nice little problem is that I sometimes use controller_name in my partials, like to light up a menu item, but I'll obviously have to take a different tactic there. I'm guessing I might have to do something to get more helpers available, but I haven't gotten there yet.

Success! Hooray! This should answer your question, and mine - I'll add more detail if it seems appropriate later. Good luck!!!!

original non-answer from an hour ago left for clarity

I don't have an answer, but this timely question deserves more clarification, and I'm hoping to get closer to my answer by helping ask :)

I'm facing the same problem. To explain a little more clearly, Pusher asynchronously sends content to a connected user browser. A typical use case would be a showing the user they have a new message from another user. With Pusher, you can push a message to the receiver's browser, so they get an immediate notification if they are logged in. For a really great demo of what Pusher can do, check out http://wordsquared.com/

You can send any data you like, such as a JSON hash to interpret how you like it, but it would be very convenient to send RJS, just like with any other ajax call and eval() it on the client side. That way, you could (for example) render the template for your menu bar, updating it in its entirety, or just the new message count displayed to the user, using all the same partials to keep it bone-DRY. In principle, you could render the partial from the sender's controller, but that doesn't make much sense either, and there might not even be a request, it could be triggered by a cron job, for example, or some other event, like a stock price change. The sender controller just should not have to know about it - I like to keep my controllers on a starvation diet ;)

It might sound like a violation of MVC, but it's really not - and it really should be solved with something like ActionMailer, but sharing helpers and partials with the rest of the app. I know in my app, I'd like to send a Pusher event at the same time as (or instead of) an ActionMailer call. I want to render an arbitrary partial for user B based on an event from user A.

These links may point the way towards a solution:

  • http://blog.choonkeat.com/weblog/2006/08/rails-calling-r.html
  • How to render a Partial from a Model in Rails 2.3.5
  • http://mattwindsurfs.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/rails-render-in-a-model/
  • http://davetroy.blogspot.com/2008/02/actsasrenderer-brings-output-to-models.html
  • https://github.com/asapnet/acts_as_renderer
  • http://ethilien.net/archives/render-rails-templates-anywhere-even-in-a-model/

The last one looks the most promising, offering up this tantalizing snippet:

def render_anywhere(partial, assigns)
view = ActionView::Base.new(Rails::Configuration.new.view_path, assigns)
ActionView::Base.helper_modules.each { |helper| view.extend helper }
view.extend ApplicationHelper
view.render(:partial => partial)
end

As does this link provided by another poster above.

I'll report back if I get something working

tl;dr: me too!

Render template in other view with another controller

You can define all required instance variables that are used in the other controller's view and render it wherever you want with:

render "other_controller/action"

If you are sharing some element (like a modal box content), a better way would be to extract it into a shared partial (shared/_your_partial.html.erb) and include it in other views. That would be more modular way of doing it.

Alternatively, you might want to use a jQuery to fill out the modal box content like so:

$('#some-button').click(function(event){
event.preventDefault();
$('#modal-box').load('controller2/index');
});

Rendering an Action Template from another controller in Rails 4


But looks like it does not activate new action in replies controller
so it doesn't create new reply

Reason: - Render doesn't create a new HTTP request(render does not load any context associated with a controller action. So, it will render the template),You may have lots of code in that new action but none of it will be run. ONLY THE VIEW WILL BE RENDERED.

You can try this

In posts#show

def show
#foo = bar
render "replies/new", locals: {reply: Reply.new}
end

In this way you would have to use local variables in replies#new too

def new
#foo = bar
reply = Reply.new
render locals: {reply: reply}
end

In replies/new.html.erb use reply instead of @reply

Rails: How to render partial view from another controller

As far as syntax goes, what you want is the following:

render partial: "posts/upvote"

Instead of sending html data (the buttons you mentioned) from controller to the partial, you should have a conditional statement in each partial that activates one button or another. From there create event handlers for each respective button. That takes care of the issue of Jquery handling internal state.



Related Topics



Leave a reply



Submit