How to Prevent Flex-Items from Overflowing Flex Parent With No Wrap

How to prevent flex-items from overflowing flex parent with no wrap?

Set display: inline-flex on the .parent class to change it to an inline element. This will also force the .parent to expand to contain its children. Then by setting min-width: 100% on the .parent class, it will force it to expand to 100% of the containing element.

.parent {
display: inline-flex;
flex-direction: row;
background-color: red;
min-width: 100%;
}
.child {
min-width: 100px;
flex-basis: 0px;
flex-grow: 1;

margin: 5px;
height: 100px;
background-color: blue;
}

Prevent flex items from overflowing a container

Your flex items have

flex: 0 0 200px; /* <aside> */
flex: 1 0 auto; /* <article> */

That means:

  • The <aside> will start at 200px wide.

    Then it won't grow nor shrink.

  • The <article> will start at the width given by the content.

    Then, if there is available space, it will grow to cover it.

    Otherwise it won't shrink.

To prevent horizontal overflow, you can:

  • Use flex-basis: 0 and then let them grow with a positive flex-grow.
  • Use a positive flex-shrink to let them shrink if there isn't enough space.

To prevent vertical overflow, you can

  • Use min-height instead of height to allow the flex items grow more if necessary
  • Use overflow different than visible on the flex items
  • Use overflow different than visible on the flex container

For example,

main, aside, article {
margin: 10px;
border: solid 1px #000;
border-bottom: 0;
min-height: 50px; /* min-height instead of height */
}
main {
display: flex;
}
aside {
flex: 0 1 200px; /* Positive flex-shrink */
}
article {
flex: 1 1 auto; /* Positive flex-shrink */
}
<main>
<aside>x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x </aside>
<article>don't let flex item overflow container.... y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y </article>
</main>

Prevent flex item from overflowing flex container

Much of the CSS in your code can be removed.

It's not necessary or conflicts with useful flex settings.

Just use flex properties to achieve the layout.

.outer {  height: 100vh;  display: flex;  flex-flow: column;}
.inner { display: flex; flex: 1; min-height: 0; /* https://stackoverflow.com/q/36247140/3597276 */}
.column { overflow-y: auto; margin: 0 10px; border: 1px solid #000;}
.column-left { flex: 0 0 25%;}
.column-right { flex: 1; display: flex; flex-flow: column;}
body, div { margin: 0; padding: 0;}
<div class="outer">  <h1>Heading of different height</h1>  <div class="inner">    <div class="column column-left">      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>      <h2>Row</h2>    </div>    <div class="column column-right">      <div class="content">        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>        <h2>Row</h2>      </div>      <div class="controls">        Variable height        <br> 1      </div>    </div>  </div></div>

Prevent flex PARENT from growing without overflow: hidden

You can remove "overflow-y: hidden" and add "height: 100%" to .splitView and -section.

.splitView{
display: flex
flex: 1 1 auto
background: rgba(#008080, 0.2)
height: 100%
&-section{
display: flex
flex-direction: column
flex: 1 1 50%
height: 100%
}
}

Since the height of the parent div is set, the children divs will inherit that height.

https://codepen.io/salixdubois/pen/JQLaRE

Prevent a child element from overflowing its parent in flexbox

An initial setting on flex items is min-width: auto. This means that a flex item, by default, cannot be smaller than the size of its content.

Therefore, text-overflow: ellipsis cannot work because a flex item will simply expand, rather than permit an overflow. (Scroll bars will not render either, for the same reason.)

To override this behavior, use min-width: 0 or overflow: hidden. More details.

#container {  display: flex;  flex-wrap: wrap;  border: thin solid gray;}
.card-wrapper { width: 33.33%; display: flex; background: #e0e0ff;}
.card { flex-grow: 1; margin: 7px; display: flex; flex-direction: column; border: thin solid gray; background: #e0ffff; overflow: hidden; /* NEW */}
.card div { border: thin solid gray;}
.card div:nth-child(1) { white-space: nowrap; text-overflow: ellipsis; overflow: hidden; /* NEW */}
.card div:nth-child(2) { flex-grow: 2;}
<div id="container">  <div class="card-wrapper">    <div class="card">      <div>Title</div>      <div>Multiline<br/>Body</div>      <div>Footer</div>    </div>  </div>  <div class="card-wrapper">    <div class="card">      <div>Really long rambling title that pushes beyond the bounds of the container, unless your screen is really, really wide</div>      <div>Body</div>      <div>Footer</div>    </div>  </div>  <div class="card-wrapper">    <div class="card">      <div>Title</div>      <div>Body</div>      <div>Footer</div>    </div>  </div>  <div class="card-wrapper">    <div class="card">      <div>Title</div>      <div>Body</div>      <div>Footer</div>    </div>  </div>  <div class="card-wrapper">    <div class="card">      <div>Title</div>      <div>Body</div>      <div>Footer</div>    </div>  </div></div>

Prevent flex item from exceeding parent height and make scroll bar work

Short Answer

Instead of flex: 1, use flex: 1 1 1px.

Make these two adjustments in your code:

#messagelist {
/* flex:1; */
flex: 1 1 1px; /* new */
}

#messagecontents {
/* flex:1; */
flex: 1 1 1px; /* new */
}

revised codepen


Explanation

In most cases, as you have noted, adding min-height: 0 to flex items in a column-direction container is enough to correct the problem.

In this case, however, there's an additional obstacle: flex-basis.

You're applying the following rule to flex items #messagelist and #messagecontents: flex: 1.

This is a shorthand rule that breaks down to:

  • flex-grow: 1
  • flex-shrink: 1
  • flex-basis: 0

(source: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#flex-common)


2019 UPDATE: Since the posting of this answer in 2018, it appears that Chrome's behavior has changed and is now uniform with Firefox and Edge. Please keep that in mind as you read the rest of this answer.


In Chrome, flex-basis: 0 is enough to trigger an overflow, which generates the scrollbars. (2019 update: This may no longer be the case.)

In Firefox and Edge, however, a zero flex-basis is insufficient. This is probably the more correct behavior in terms of standards compliance as MDN states:

In order for overflow to have an effect, the block-level container must have either a set height (height or max-height) or white-space set to nowrap.

Well, flex-basis: 0 meets none of those conditions, so an overflow condition should not occur. Chrome has probably engaged in an intervention (as they often do).

An intervention is when a user agent decides to deviate slightly from a standardized behavior in order to provide a greatly enhanced user experience.

To meet the "standardized behavior", which would enable an overflow to occur in Firefox and Edge, give flex-basis a fixed height (even if it's just 1px).

Flex child is overflowing the parent container even after setting min-width:0?

There are a couple of issues with what you posted, but fear not we can sort you out.

What is flex, what is not

First let's look at your markup:

.parent is an element with display: flex. From your naming we might incorrectly assume that its children are:

  • .child1,
  • .child2, and
  • .child3.

…but this is not the case.

The children of .parent are actually:

  • .child1, and
  • a classless div.

The classless div has no styles set for it, so .child2 and .child3 are not positioned in a flexbox context. For this reason, your min-width: 0 on .child3 doesn't solve your problem, as that solution only applies for flex children.

Applying min-width in the correct context

To start, let's give that child div a class: .foo.

.foo itself has a block display, but currently it is allowing content (in .child3) to overflow. It is this element on which we want to prevent overflow:

.foo {
min-width: 0;
}

That should be all you need. It seems you're already familiar with why we use min-width to help with this, but just in case you can read about it in CSS Tricks: Flexbox and Truncated Text.

Solution

Below is all of it put together.

.parent {
display: flex;
border: 2px solid red;
}

.foo {
min-width: 0;
outline: 1px solid rebeccapurple;
}

.child1 {
background: cyan;
height: 40px;
width: 40px;
flex-shrink: 0;
}

.child2 {
background: pink;
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
}

.child3 {
background: yellow;
height: 20px;
white-space: nowrap;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
max-width: 100%;
}
<div class='parent'>
<div class='child1'>1</div>
<div class="foo">
<div class='child2'>2</div>
<div class='child3'>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed luctus sagittis odio, ac pulvinar tortor sagittis et. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Phasellus ut velit dolor. Vestibulum pulvinar orci libero, in aliquet arcu auctor non. Morbi volutpat elit id lacus cursus, at imperdiet tellus eleifend. Morbi euismod vehicula urna, sed pretium felis ullamcorper vitae. Nunc at ligula a odio eleifend convallis eget sed orci. Praesent fermentum, sem in congue tempus, ex diam suscipit neque, in ullamcorper orci erat eu orci.
</div>
</div>
</div>


Related Topics



Leave a reply



Submit